Innovation in Regulatory Science: Metrics for Evaluation of Regulatory Science Claims Based on Best Available Regulatory Science
Keywords:best available regulatory science, level of maturity science, outside the purview of science, reliability of science
This paper describes the historical evolution of the Best Available Science concept leading to Best Available Regulatory Science (BARS) and Metrics for Evaluation of Regulatory Science Claims (MERSC). The paper identified five BARS Principles consisting of Open-mindedness, Skepticism, Scientific Rules, Ethical Rules, and Reproducibility. These Principles lead to three pillars. The pillar of Standardization consists of Proven Science (scientific laws and their applications); Evolving Science, consisting of Reproducible, Partially Reproducible, Association Based, Hypothesized Evolving Science; Borderline Science (Judgement and Speculation); and Fallacious Information. The pillar of Reliability includes Personal Opinions, Gray Literature, Peer-reviewed, and Consensus-processed Science. The final pillar describes areas Outside the Purview of Science, implying that societal objectives, ideology, or any other non-scientific issue are not science but policies. The separation of science from non-scientific issues and processes is a key element of regulatory science.
https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs-v05n01p050 (DOI assigned 4/17/2019)
Clean Air Act of 1977, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.
Clean Water Act of 1977, 33 U.S C. § 466 et seq.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. § 1531-1544.
Guldin, J. M., Cawrse, D., Graham, R., Hemstrom, M., Joyce, L., Kessler, S., McNair, R., Peterson, G., Shaw, C. G., Stine, P., Twery, M., & Walter, J. (2003). The Science Consistency Review: A Tool To Evaluate the Use of Scientific Information in Land Management Decisionmaking. Publication FS-772.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Mathew Effect in Science. Science, 159, 56-63.
Mervis, J. (2014, October 2). Battle between NSF and House science committee escalates: How did it get this bad? Science. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/10/battle-between-nsf-and-house-science-committee-escalates-how-did-it-get-bad
Moghissi, A. A., Swetnam, M., Love, B. R., & Straja, S. R. (2010). Best available science: Fundamental metrics for evaluation of scientific claims. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute Press.
Moghissi, A. A., McBride, D. K., & Amin, M. (2011). Regulatory Sciences: Description of the disciplines, education, and ethics. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Ministry of Science and Technology.
Moghissi, A. A., Love, B. R., & Straja, S. R. (2013). Peer Review and Scientific Assessment: A Handbook for Funding Organizations, Regulatory Agencies, and Editors. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Regulatory Science.
Moghissi, A. A., Gerra, V. K., McBride, D. K., & Swetnam, M. (2014). Scientific foundation of regulating ionizing radiation: Application of metrics for evaluation of regulatory science information. Health Physics, 107, 388-3294.
Moghissi, A. A., Straja S. R., Love, B. R., McBride, D. K., & Stough, R. R. (2014). Innovation in Regulatory Science: Evolution of a new scientific discipline. Technology and Innovation, 16, 155-1165.
Moghissi, A. A., Pei, S., & Lui, Y. (2015). Golden Rice: Scientific, regulatory, and public information processes of genetically modified organism. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 34, 1-7.
National Acadmies (NA). (2004). Improving the use of "Best Scientific Information Available" standard in fisheries management. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Magnuson-Stevens Fishery conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of Northeastern Unites States; Northeast multispecies fishery framework adjustment 50 Emergency rule extension, Georges Bank Yellowtail Flounder and White Hake catch limits and GOM cd carryover revisions, 78 F.R. § 26171-26209 (2013).
Parker, K. (2014, November 12). Obama and the "stupidity of the American voter". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-barack-obama-affordable-care-act-stupidity-perspec-1113-jm-20141112-story.html
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq. (1996).
Sheldon, D., Hruby, T., Johnson, P., Harper, K., McMillain, A., Granger, T., Stanley, S., Stockdale, E. (2005). Wetlands in Washington State. Volume 1: A synthesis of the Science. Olympia, WA: Department of Ecology's Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program.
Sullivan, P.J., Acheson, J. M., Angermeier, P. L., Faast, T., Flemma, J., Jones, C. M., Knudsen, E. E., Minello, T. J., Secor, D. H., Wunderlich, R., & Zanetell, B. A. (2006). Defining and Implementing Best Available Science for Fisheries and Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, pp. 46-465.
U.S. Department of the Interior. Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 73 F.R. § 61292- 61323 (2008).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.) OPP's Science Policy Council (SciPoC). Retrieved September 2016 from https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/ppdc/ppdc/pria/october09/scipoc.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). "Our Mission and What We Do". Retrieved from www.epa.gov//aboutepa/our-mission-and-what-we-do
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2010). The Promise of Regulatory Science. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/scienceresearch/specialtopics/regulatoryscience/ucm228206.htm
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting content to the Journal of Regulatory Science (JRS), authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JRS the right of first publication. Authors retain patent, trademark, and other intellectual property rights (including research data) and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International — CC BY-NC 4.0 license agreement. The JRS is an open access journal and, as a result, articles are free to use with proper acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
- If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
- The publication of the submission has been approved by all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute or organization where the work has been carried out.
- Copyright has not been breached in seeking publication of the submission.