Risk Assessment of Copper and Molybdenum and Other Minerals in Feed Ingredients and Finished Feeds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21423/JRS-V07POSTKeywords:
animal feed, hazard, risk assessment, copper, molybdenum, contaminants, minerals, essential minerals, feed ingredients, finished feedsAbstract
This is a risk assessment for six mineral contaminants and four essential minerals. A total of 1,466 samples were collected from 18 product categories during 2010 to 2018. The 18 product categories were divided into 11 finished feed (689 samples) categories and seven feed ingredient categories (777 samples). Mineral and vitamin/minerals mixes (565 samples) were the predominant products in the seven feed ingredient categories, and beef cattle feed (351 samples) was the predominant product in the 11 finished feed categories. Samples from the 18 product categories were analyzed for up to 10 minerals: arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), molybdenum (Mo), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), selenium (Se), and thallium (Tl). Cr, Cu, Mo, and Se are essential nutrients, and the other six are contaminants. The ratios of mean concentrations of the 6 inorganic contaminants across the 11 finished feeds were low compared to the seven feed ingedients categories. This implies that the risk of toxicity from the potential carryover of the six contaminants from feed ingredients to finished feeds is low. The mean Cu concentrations were high and the mean Mo concentrations were low in the four finished feed categories for ruminants (cattle, sheep, and goats). The ideal copper:molybdenum (Cu:Mo) ratio is >6:1 and <10:1 in the four finished feed categories for ruminants. The calculated Cu:Mo ratio of 26:1 shows a nutritional imbalance between Cu and Mo that may cause Cu toxicosis with long-term exposure.
https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs-v07post
References
Adamse, P., Van der Fels-Klerx, H. J., & de Jong, J. (2017). Cadmium, lead, mercury and arsenic in animal feed and feed materials - trend analysis of monitoring results. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A, 34:8, 1298-1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1300686
Association of American Feed Control Officials. (2019). Official Guidelines Suggested for Contaminant Levels Permitted in Mineral Feed Ingredients. In 2019 Official Publication (pp. 296). Champaign, IL: Association of American Feed Control Officials.
Ammerman, C. B., Miller, S. M., Fick, K. R., & Hansard, S. L., II. (1977). Contaminating elements in mineral Supplements and their Potential Toxicity: a review. Journal of Animal Science, 44, 485-508. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.443485x
Bartoskewitz, M. L., Hewitt, D. G., Laurenz, J. C., & Pitts, J. S. (2007). Effect of dietary copper and zinc concentrations on white-tailed deer antler growth, body size, and immune system function. Small Ruminant Research 73(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.11.005
Bradley, C. H. (1993). Copper poisoning in a dairy herd fed a mineral supplement. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 34, 287-292.
Bremner, I. (1998). Manifestations of copper excess. American Journal Clinical Nutrition, 67(5 Suppl), 1969S-1073S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/67.5.1069S
Ceacero, F., Landete-Castillejos, T., Augusto Olguín, A., Miranda, M., García, A., Martínez, A., . . . Gallego, L. (2015). Avoiding Toxic Levels of Essential Minerals: A Forgotten Factor in Deer Diet Preferences. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115814
Dai, S. Y., Jones, B., Lee, K-M., Li, W., Post, L., & Herrman, T. J. (2016). Heavy Metal Contamination of Animal Feed in Texas. Journal of Regulatory Science, 4(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs-v04n01p021
Dick, A. T. (1956). Molybdenum in animal nutrition. Soil Science, 81(3), 229-258.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2006). Exposure Assessment. In Food safety risk analysis. A guide for national food safety authorities (pp. 119). FAO Food and Nutrition Papers, Book 87. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Garcia, R. A., & Rosentrater, K. A. (2008). Concentration of key elements in North American meat and bone meal. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(9), 887-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.011
Gengelbach, G. P., Ward, J. D., Spears, J. W., & Brown, T. T., Jr. (1997). Effects of copper deficiency and copper deficiency coupled with high dietary iron or molybdenum on phagocytic cell function and response of calves to a respiratory disease challenge. Journal of Animal Science, 75(4),1112-1118. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7541112x
Granados-Chinchilla, F., Mena, S. P., & Arias, L. M. (2015). Inorganic contaminants and composition analysis of commercial feed grade mineral compounds available in Costa Rica. International Journal of Food Contamination, 2(8), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-015-0015-1
Hogan, K. G., Money, D. F. L., & Blayney. A. (1968). The effect of a molybdate and sulfate supplement on the accumulation of copper in the livers of penned sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(2), 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1968.10431440
Kroll, J. C. (2016, April 11). Minerals: What Do Whitetail Need? - Part 2. Retrieved March 2019 from http://www.northamericanwhitetail.com/editorial/minerals-what-do-whitetail-need-part-2/262335
Li, Y., McCrory, D. F., Powell, J. M., Saam, H., & Jackson-Smith, D. B. (2005). A survey of selected heavy metal concentrations in Wisconsin dairy feeds. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(8), 2911-2922. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72972-6
Makkar, H. P. S., & Philippe, A. (2014). A need for generating sound quantitative data at national levels for feed-efficient animal production. Animal Production Science, 54(10), 1569-1574. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14377
Mangalgiri, K. P., Adaka, A., & Blaney, L. (2015). Organoarsenicals in poultry litter: Detection, fate, and toxicity. Environment International, 75, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.022
Mason, J., & Cardin, C. J. (1977). The competition of molybdate and sulphate ions for a transport system in the ovine small intestine. Research in Veterinary Science, 22(3), 313-315.
McDowell, L. R. (2003). Minerals in Animal and Human Nutrition, 2nd Edition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Moeller, R. B., Jr. (2004). Copper. In K. Plumlee (Ed.), Clinical Veterinary Toxicology (pp. 195-197). St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby.
Nagy, J. G., Chappel, W., & Ward, G. M. (1975). Effects of high molybdenum intake in mule deer. Journal of Animal Science, 41(1).
National Resource Council. (1980). Mineral Tolerance of Domestic Animals. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25
National Resource Council. (1983). Selenium in Nutrition, Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/40
National Resource Council. (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Seventh Revised Edition, 2001. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9825
National Resource Council. (2005). Mineral Tolerance of Animals: Second Revised Edition, 2005. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11309
National Resource Council. (2007). Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants; Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11654
Nicholson, F. A., Chambers, B. J., Williams, J. R., & Unwin, R. J. (1999). Heavy metal contents of livestock feeds and animal manures in England and Wales. Bioresource Technology, 70(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00017-6
Spears, J. W. (2003). Trace mineral bioavailability in ruminants. The Journal of Nutrition, 133(5 Suppl 1), 1506S-1509S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.5.1506S
Toth, T., Arva, M., Kopernicka, M., Slavik, M., Tomas, J., Lazor, P., . . . Kavalcova, P. (2015). Heavy Metal Screening in Compounds Feeds. Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 48(1), 51-56.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1995). Selenium, 21 CFR § 573.920. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=573.920
Underwood, E. J., & Suttle, N. F (1999). The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock, 3rd Edition. New York, NY: CABI Publishing.
van Raamsdonk, L. W. D., van Eijkeren, J. C. H., Meijer, G. A. L., Rennen, M., Zeilmaker, M. J., Hoogenboom, L. A. P., & Mengelers, M. J. B. (2009). Compliance of feed limits, does not mean compliance of food limits. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 13(S), 51-57.
Wang, H., Dong, Y., Yang, Y., Toor, G. S., & Zhang, X. (2013). Changes in heavy metal contents in animal feeds and manures in an intensive animal production region of China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 25(12), 2435-2442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60473-8
Zhang, F., Li, Y., Yang, M., & Li, W. (2012). Content of heavy metals in animal feeds and manures from farms of different scales in northeast China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(8), 2658-2668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9082658
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Regulatory Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting content to the Journal of Regulatory Science (JRS), authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JRS the right of first publication. Authors retain patent, trademark, and other intellectual property rights (including research data) and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International — CC BY-NC 4.0 license agreement. The JRS is an open access journal and, as a result, articles are free to use with proper acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
- If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
- The publication of the submission has been approved by all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute or organization where the work has been carried out.
- Copyright has not been breached in seeking publication of the submission.