How Protective is the Pesticide Risk Assessment and Registration Process to Humans in the United States?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21423/JRS.REGSCI.111249Keywords:
pesticide risk assessment, pesticide registration, compounding health-protectiveness, human health protectionAbstract
The need to feed the growing world population is a daunting challenge and improving crop yield using technology (e.g., synthetic pesticides) is a primary solution being utilized by growers globally. However, there is a general perception that the U.S. population is not well protected from the effects of using pesticides. This leads us to a natural question: how protective to humans is the pesticide risk assessment and registration process in the U.S.? In this commentary, we aim to give an overview of the regulatory history of pesticides in the U.S. and systematically discuss the data-driven, comprehensive, and health-protective methods employed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in accordance with the stringent mandates of the laws passed by U.S. Congress and the regulations enacted by the EPA to protect the U.S. population. By describing the studies required under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), along with the health-protective models and assumptions employed by the EPA to evaluate the potential for human health risks from pesticides, we aim to highlight the compounding health-protectiveness of the existing regulatory framework. We emphasize the need to maintain a regulated risk-benefit balance in using modern agricultural technology, similar to what is done with other indispensable modern human innovations and technologies.
References
Boone, M. D., Bishop, C. A., Boswell, L. A., Brodman, R. D., Burger, J., Davidson, C., Gochfeld, M., Hoverman. et al. (2014) Pesticide regulation amid the influence of industry. Bioscience 64(10):917–922
Bruce, A. B., Borlu, Y., Glenna, L. L. (2022). Assessing the scientific support for U.S. EPA pesticide regulatory policy governing active and inert ingredients. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. J Environ Stud Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-022-00788-4
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). (2019). Interpreting Pesticide Residues in Food. Issue Paper 66. Retrieved from https://www.cast-science.org/publication/interpreting-pesticide-residues-in-food/
Crépet, A., Luong, T. M., Baines, J., Boon, P. E., Ennis, J., Kennedy, M., Massarelli, I., Miller, D., Nako, S., Reuss, R., Yoon, H. J., & Verger, P. (2021). An international probabilistic risk assessment of acute dietary exposure to pesticide residues in relation to codex maximum residue limits for pesticides in food. Food Control, 121(August 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107563
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2009). Declaration of the World Summit on Food Security. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/Summit/Docs/Final_Declaration/WSFS09_Declaration.pdf
Food Quality Protection Act. (1996). Food Quality Protection Act of1996, Public Law 104-170
Gehen, S., Corvaro, M., Jones, J., Ma, M., & Yang, Q. (2019). Challenges and Opportunities in the Global Regulation of Crop Protection Products [Review-article]. Organic Process Research & Development, 23, 2225–2233. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00284
Hays, S. M., Becker, R. A., Leung, H. W., Aylward, L. L., Pyatt, D. W. (2007). Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol47:96-10917030369
Lewis, R. W., Billington, R., Debryune, E., Gamer, A., Lang, B., & Carpanini, F. (2002). Recognition of Adverse and Nonadverse Effects in Toxicity Studies. Toxicologic Pathology, 30(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230252824725
Maienfisch, P., & Stevenson, T. M. (2015). Modern agribusiness - Markets, companies, benefits and challenges. ACS Symposium Series, 1204, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015-1204.ch001
Moore, D. R. J., Mccarroll-butler, C. A., Avanasi, R., & Chen, W., White, M. & Brain R.A. (2021). Regulatory Science How Protective to the Environment is the Pesticide Risk Assessment and Registration Process in the United States ? Journal of Regulatory Science, 9(2), 1–20.
National Research Council. 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government. Managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). OECD document on crop field trials. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Paris, 2016. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://one.oecd.org/document/ENV/JM/MONO(2011)50/REV1/en/pdf
Popp, J., Hantos, K. (2011). Studies in agricultural economics. No. 113. Stud Agric Econ, 113, 47–66.
Popp, J. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis of crop protection measures. Journal Fur Verbraucherschutz Und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 6(SUPPL. 1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-011-0677-4
Sobus, J. R., DeWoskin, R. S., Tan, Y., Pleil, J. D., Philips, M. B., George, B. J., Christensen, K., Schreinemachers, D. M., Williams, M, A., Cohen-Hubal, E. A., Edwards, S. (2015). Uses of NHANES Biomarker Data for Chemical Risk Assessment: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities. Environ Health Perspect 123: 919-927; doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409177.
United States Department of Agriculture. (2015). Pesticide Data Program. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/PDP%20factsheet.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1988). EPA History: FIFRA Amendments of 1988. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://archive.epa.gov/epa/aboutepa/epa-history-fifra-amendments-1988.html#:~:text=The%20Federal%20Insecticide%2C%20Fungicide%20and%20Rodenticide%20Act%20(FIFRA)%20governs,sold%20or%20distributed%20in%20commerce
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1994). The role of BEAD in pesticide regulation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/200001EH.PDF?Dockey=200001EH.PDF
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1996a). Summary of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-federal-insecticide-fungicide-and-rodenticide-act
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1996b). Summary of the Food Quality Protection Act. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-food-quality-protection-act
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2000a). Available information on assessing exposure from pesticides in food- A User's guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0780-0001
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2000b). Choosing a percentile of acute dietary exposure as a threshold of regulatory concern. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/trac2b054_0.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2001a). General Principles For Performing Aggregate Exposure And Risk Assessments. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/aggregate.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2001b). Science advisory council for exposure policy 9.1. Standard values for daily acres treated in agriculture. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2002a). Summary of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2002b). Determination of the appropriate FQPA safety factor(s) in tolerance assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/determ.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2002c). A review of the reference dose and reference concentration processes. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-12/documents/rfd-final.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2002d). Guidance on Cumulative Risk Assessment of Pesticide Chemicals That Have a Common Mechanism of Toxicity. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/guidance_on_common_mechanism.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2005). Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential by the Office of Pesticide Programs. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from http://npic.orst.edu/chemicals_evaluated.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition (Final Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-09/052F, 2011.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2012a). Exposure Models: DEEM-FCID/Calendex/SHEDS. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/deem-fcidcalendex-software-installer#models
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2012b). Standard Operating Procedure for Residential Exposure and Risk Assessment for Pesticides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/standard-operating-procedure-residential-exposure
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2012c). Guidance for Requiring/Waiving Turf Transferable Residue and Dislodgeable Foliar Residue Studies. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 2012.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Office of Pesticide Programs’ Framework for Incorporating Human Epidemiologic & Incident Data in Risk Assessments for Pesticides Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0316-DRAFT-0075.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2018a). PRIA Overview and History. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/pria-fees/pria-overview-and-history#pria4
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2018b). Assessment of Occupational Exposure for Post-Harvest Commodity Pesticide Treatments. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 2012
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2019). Directive to Prioritize Effects to Reduce Animal Testing. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-09/documents/image2019-09-09-231249.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020a). PART 180—Tolerances and exemptions for pesticide chemical residues in food. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2020-title40-vol26/pdf/CFR-2020-title40-vol26-part180.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020b). PART 160—Good Laboratory Practice Standards. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2020-title40-vol26/pdf/CFR-2020-title40-vol26-part160.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020c). PART 158—Data requirements for pesticides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2020-title40-vol26/pdf/CFR-2020-title40-vol26-part158.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020d). PART 170—Worker protection Standard. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2020-title40-vol26/pdf/CFR-2020-title40-vol26-part170.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021a). Pesticide Registration Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/pesticide-registration-manual
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021b). About Pesticide Registration. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/about-pesticide-registration
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021c). The U.S. EPA's What We Eat in America - Food Commodity Intake Database, 2005-2010 (WWEIA-FCID 2005-10). Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://fcid.foodrisk.org/#
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021d). Occupational Pesticide Handler Unit Exposure Surrogate Reference Table. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-05/documents/occupational-pesticide-handler-unit-exposure-surrogate-reference-table-may-2021.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021e). Science Advisory Council for Exposure(ExpoSAC) Policy 3. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/documents/usepa-opp-hed_exposac_policy_3_march2021_0.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021f). OPP Report on Incident Information: The Baseline. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/ppdc/web/pdf/session10-finalrpt.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021g). Restricted Use Products (RUP) Report. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-worker-safety/restricted-use-products-rup-report
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021h). Conventional Reduced Risk Pesticide Program. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/conventional-reduced-risk-pesticide-program
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2022a). Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Seed Treatment. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-01/exposac-policy-14_seed-treatment-exposure-data.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2022b). Standard Values for Amount of Seed Treated and/or Planted Per Day. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-01/exposac-policy-15_amount-seed-treated-planted.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2022c). PRN 97-6: Use of Term "Inert" in the Label Ingredients Statement. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved November 1, 2022 from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/prn-97-6-use-term-inert-label-ingredients-statement
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2022d). PRN 97-6: Developing Relative Potency Factors For Pesticide Mixtures: Biostatistical Analyses Of Joint Dose-Response. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Retrieved November 1, 2022 https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=66273
Winter, C. K., & Katz, J. M. (2011). Dietary exposure to pesticide residues from commodities alleged to contain the highest contamination levels. Journal of Toxicology, 2011(6). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/589674
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-02-04 (2)
- 2023-02-01 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Raghavendhran Avanasi, Aubrey Glover, Caleb Lord, Jessica Macari, Michael Munday, Carol McKillican, Nestor Algarin, Amy McCaskill, Ronald Hampton, Richard Brain, Kevin Leiner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting content to the Journal of Regulatory Science (JRS), authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JRS the right of first publication. Authors retain patent, trademark, and other intellectual property rights (including research data) and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International — CC BY-NC 4.0 license agreement. The JRS is an open access journal and, as a result, articles are free to use with proper acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
- If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
- The publication of the submission has been approved by all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute or organization where the work has been carried out.
- Copyright has not been breached in seeking publication of the submission.
