A national probabilistic characterization of local crop proximity and density for refining US screening level exposure estimates of pesticides in surface water arising from agricultural use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21423/JRS-V10A216Keywords:
Aquatic exposure modeling, Catchment, Pyrethroids, Surface water, Geographic Information System, Landscape, SpatialAbstract
Rising world population and changing diets are increasing the need for efficient and effective food and fiber production. Pesticides are used across the US to control pests and improve food yield and quality, but these benefits are offset by their potential to reach and possibly impact aquatic or terrestrial ecosystems. Regulatory agencies rely on prospective exposure models that often start with conservative simplifying assumptions that are refined with additional information if needed. The USEPA ecological risk assessment framework for pesticides assumes, at screening level, that 100% of the area draining to a water body is cropped. However, at the grower’s real-world scale, this simplifying assumption is generally not realistic and should be refined for higher tier assessment. The present study developed a US-wide spatially explicit analysis of crop density and proximity to surface waters to characterize the potential for pyrethroid insecticides to enter flowing surface waters. Reliable, transparent, and publicly available government spatial cropping and hydrology datasets were employed at the catchment-scale across the full extent of agricultural production in the US were used to generate fifteen novel crop-specific probabilistic distributions describing the extent and proximity of each crop to the flowing water body defining small catchments. These were used to refine estimated environmental concentrations using USEPA standard regulatory scenarios to evaluate the importance of considering agricultural landscapes when refining aquatic pesticide concentrations. Incorporating these real-world probabilities of crop occurrence and proximity showed that, while potential maximal aquatic exposure concentrations are unchanged, the probability of exceeding regulatory decision-making concentration endpoints is much lower than predicted by standard assumptions (e.g., 1.9 to ~50-fold reductions by crop for 90% of catchments). Additionally, we show that the relative ranking of crops by their aquatic pesticide exposure potential may change from that indicated when cropping density and proximity are considered.
References
AgInfomatics, (2017). The value of pyrethroids in U.S. agricultural and urban settings: Executive Summary. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0480-0235
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. (2021). https://bbsrc.ukri.org/documents/pyrethroid-timeline-pdf/
Boryan, C., Yang, Z., & Di, L., (2012). Deriving 2011 Cultivated Land Cover Data Sets Using USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service Historic Cropland Data Layers. Proc. of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, July 22-27, 2012, Munich, Germany.
Brakebill, J., Wolock D., & Terziotti, S. (2011). Digital Hydrologic Networks Supporting Applications Related to Spatially Referenced Regression Modeling. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 47(5), 916–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00578.x
Brown, C.D., Beulke, S., Biggs, J., Holmes C., Maltby, L., van Beinum, W., Williams, R. & Yallop, M. (2007. Assessing the impact of agricultural pesticides in the environment (phase II). Environment Agency Science Report SC030189/SR1, Environment Agency, Almondsbury, Bristol. 2007. ISBN: 9781844326839.
Desmarteau, D., Price, K., Ritter, A & Hendley, P. (2014). Estimated pyrethroid exposure concentrations in static water bodies for relevant US EPA agricultural, turf and residential use modeling scenarios using Tier II and Tier II+ input assumptions. PWG Report - PWG-ERA-06. MRID 49327501. Waterborne Environmental Inc. Leesburg, VA.
Desmarteau D., Ritter, A., Hendley, P., & Guevara, M. (2020). Impact of Wind Speed and Direction and Key Meteorological Parameters on Potential Pesticide Drift Mass Loadings from Sequential Aerial Applications. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020 Mar; 16(2):197-210. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4221.
Elferink, M. & Schierhorn, F. (2016). Global Demand for Food Is Rising. Can We Meet It? https://hbr.org/2016/04/global-demand-for-food-is-rising-can-we-meet-it
FOCUS. (2007). Landscape and mitigation factors in aquatic risk assessment. Vol 1. Extended summary and recommendations. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp.
Frampton, G. K., Römbke, J., Jänsch, S., Scott-Fordsmand, J. & van den Brink, P. J. (2006). WEBFRAM 5: Incorporating uncertainty in pesticide risk assessment for soil invertebrates. In Controversies and solutions in environmental sciences; abstract book SETAC Europe 16th annual meeting (pp. 169). SETAC. Accessible via https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/webfram-5-incorporating-uncertainty-in-pesticide-risk-assessment-
Garcia-Alonso, M., Hendley, P., Bigler, F., Mayeregger, E., Parker, R., Rubinstein, C., Satorre, E., Solari, F. & McLean, M. A. (2014). Transportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants: a conceptual framework. Transgenic Res 23, 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9785-0
GfK Kynetec. (2013). AgroTrak® database. GfK Kynetec, Creve Coeur, MO, 63146, USA. www.gfk-kynetec.com (now https://www.kynetec.com/) Data accessed June 2013.
Giddings, J., Hendley, P., Holmes, C., Ritter, A., Desmarteau, D., Winchell, M. & Wirtz, J. (2015). Ecological risk assessment of agricultural uses of nine synthetic pyrethroids. PWG Report - PWG-ERA-18. MRID 49801901. Compliance Services International. Lakewood, WA.
Gimsing, A.L., Agert, J., Baran, N. et al. (2019). Conducting groundwater monitoring studies in Europe for pesticide active substances and their metabolites in the context of Regulation (EC) 1107/2009. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 14, 1–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-019-01211-x
Hart, A.(Ed.) and Elmegaard, N. (2001). Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Pesticides in Europe - Implementation & Research Needs: Report of the European Workshop on Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the Environmental Impacts of Plant Protection Products (EUPRA), The Netherlands June 5-8, 2001. York, UK: Central Science Laboratory. http://www.csl.gov.uk/prodserv/rds/env/risk/eupra/report.cfm
Hendley, P., Holmes, C., Kay, S., Maund, S. J., Travis, K. Z. & Zhang, M. (2001). Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Cotton Pyrethroids: III. A Spatial Analysis of the Mississippi, USA, Cotton Landscape. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20, no. 3 (2001): 669–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200328
Hill, R., Weber, M., Leibowitz, S., Olsen, A. & Thornbrugh, D. (2016). The Stream-Catchment (StreamCat) Dataset: A Database of Watershed Metrics for the Conterminous United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 52:120-128. DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12372.
https://www.epa.gov/national-aquatic-resource-surveys/streamcat-dataset-0
IPM Institute of North America. (2021). https://ipminstitute.org/what-is-integrated-pest-management/
Ippolito, A. & Fait, G. (2019). Pesticides in surface waters: from edge-of-field to global modelling. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 36, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.023
Johnston, C., Dewald, T., Bondelid, T., Worstell, B., McKay, L., Rea, A., Moore, R., & Goodall, J. (2009). Evaluation of Catchment Delineation Methods for the Medium-Resolution National Hydrography Dataset: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report. 2009–5233. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5233/
Liess, M. & R. Schulz, R. (1999). Linking insecticide contamination and population response in an agricultural stream. ET&C Volume18, Issue9, September 1999, Pages 1948-1955. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620180913
Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Parsons, J. E. (2010). VFSMOD-W Vegetative Filter Strips Modelling System. Model Documentation and User’s Manual, version 5.x. June 19, 2010.
OECD. (2021). Better policies to improve the environmental performance of the agriculture sector. https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/agriculture-and-the-environment/
Padilla, L., Winchell, M, & Jackson, S. (2015). Evaluation of AGRO-2014 for Predicting Hydrophobic Organic Chemical Concentrations in Ponds. J. Environ. Qual. 44:1568-1578. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.03.0149
Padovani, L., Capri, E. & Trevisan,M. (2004). Landscape-Level Approach to Assess Aquatic Exposure via Spray Drift for Pesticides: A Case Study in a Mediterranean Area. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 3239–3246. https://doi.org/10.1021/es049699p
Pistocchi, A., (2008). A GIS-based Approach for Modeling the Fate and Transport of Pollutants in Europe. Environmental Science & Technology 42, 3640–3647. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES071548%2B
Pistocchi, A., Groenwold, J., Lahr, J., Loos, M., Mujica, M., Ragas, A., Rallo, R., Sala, S., Schlink, U., Strebel, K., Vighi, M., & Vizcaino, P. (2011). Mapping Cumulative Environmental Risks: Examples from the EU NoMiracle Project. Environ Model Assess 16, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-010-9230-6
Pollock, D., Kookana, R. & Correll, R. (2005). Integration of the Pesticide Impact Rating Index with a Geographic Information System for the Assessment of Pesticide Impact on Water Quality. Water Air Soil Pollut: Focus 5, 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-005-7398-6
Riley W., Potter, E., Biggs, J., Collins, A., Jarvie, H., Jones, J., Kelly-Quinn, M., Ormerod, S., Sear, D., Wilby, R., Broadmeadow, S., Brown, C., Chanin, P., Copp, G., Cowx, I., Grogan, A., Hornby, D., Huggett, D., Kelly, M., Naura, M., Newman, J., & Siriwardena, G. (2018). Small Water Bodies in Great Britain and Ireland: Ecosystem function, human-generated degradation, and options for restorative action, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 645, 2018, Pages 1598-1616, ISSN 0048-9697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.243.
Ritter, A., Desmarteau, D., Hendley, P. & Holmes, C. M. (2021). National characterization of runoff and erosion potential to put USEPA standard ecological scenarios in context for pyrethroids. (Manuscript submitted).
Sala, S. & Vighi, M. (2008). GIS-based procedure for site-specific risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic ecosystems. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 69, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.06.015
Solomon, K., Giesy, J., & Jones, P. (2000). Probabilistic risk assessment of agrochemicals in the environment. Crop Protection 19, 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00086-7
Suárez, L. A. (2005). PRZM_3, A Model for Predicting Pesticide and Nitrogen Fate in the Crop Root and Unsaturated Soil Zones: Users Manual for Release 3.12.2, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-05/111 (NTIS PB2006-101105), 2005. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=525014&Lab=NERL
Teske, M., Bird, S., Esterly, D., Ray, S. & Perry, S. (2003). A User's Guide for AgDRIFT® 2.0.07: A Tiered Approach for the Assessment of Spray Drift of Pesticides, Regulatory Version, C.D.I. Report No. 01-02, CDI, Ewing, NJ. https://usermanual.wiki/Pdf/AgDriftusermanualpubFes2003.1946090729.pdf
Thomas, K., Resseler, H., Spatz, R., Hendley, P., Sweeney, P., Urban, M. & Kubiak, R. (2016). A simple approach for a spatial terrestrial exposure assessment of the insecticide fenoxycarb, based on a high‐resolution landscape analysis. Pest. Manag. Sci. 72, 2099–2109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4338
United Nations. (2019). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. ST/ESA/SER.A/423. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf
USDA. (2013). National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropland Data Layer 2012. Published crop-specific data layer [Online]. Available at https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/. Washington, DC Accessed July 8, 2013.
USDA. (2014). U. S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS), 2012 Census of Agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/. Accessed June 2014.
USDA. (2020). Farms and Land in Farms 2019 Summary (February 2020). U. S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS), ISSN: 1995-2004. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Todays_Reports/reports/fnlo0220.pdf. Accessed January 2021.
USDA. (2021). CropScape and Cropland Data Layer National Download. National Agricultural Statistics Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Research_and_Science/Cropland/Release/
USEPA. (1992). Framework for ecological risk assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460. EPA/630/R-92/001. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-11/documents/framework_eco_assessment.pdf
USEPA. (1999). Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods (ECOFRAM) https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/ecological-committee-fifra-risk-assessment-methods
USEPA. (2004a). Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM) Field and Orchard Crop Scenarios: Guidance for Selecting Field Crop and Orchard Scenario Input Parameters. November 15, 2001; Revisions July 2004.
USEPA. (2004b). Overview of the Ecological Risk Assessment Process in the Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Endangered and Threatened Species Effects Determinations. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, OPP, Washington, D.C. January 23, 2004. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-11/documents/ecorisk-overview.pdf
USEPA. (2005). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Geological Survey. National Hydrography Dataset Plus – NHDPlus Edition 2.0. http://www.horizon-systems.com/nhdplus/. Accessed July 2010.
USEPA. (2008). Clean Watersheds Needs Survey (CWNS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Accessible via https://www.epa.gov/cwns
USEPA. (2015a). WATERS (Watershed Assessment, Tracking & Environmental Results System). Accessible via http://www2.epa.gov/waterdata/waters-watershed-assessment-tracking-environmental-results-system.
USEPA. (2015b). National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Accessible via https://www.epa.gov/npdes
USEPA. (2015c). EPA Office of Water (OW): 303(d) listed impaired waters NHDPlus indexed dataset [Internet]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Accessible via https://developer.epa.gov/epa-office-of-water-ow-303d-listed-impaired-waters-nhdplus-indexed-dataset/.
USEPA. (2016a). Preliminary Comparative Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment for the Registration Review of Eight Synthetic Pyrethroids and the Pyrethrins. Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0331 https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0331
USEPA. (2016b). National Lakes Assessment 2012: A Collaborative Survey of Lakes in the United States. EPA 841-R-16-113. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. https://nationallakesassessment.epa.gov
USEPA. (2019). Ecological Risk Mitigation Proposal for 23 Pyrethroids and Pyrethrins Chemicals. Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0331. https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0331
USEPA. (2020a). Restricted Use Product Summary Report (November 16, 2020). https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-11/documents/rup-report-nov2020.pdf
USEPA. (2020b). Integrating a Distributional Approach to Using Percent Crop Area (PCA) and Percent Crop Treated (PCT) into Drinking Water Assessment. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Program, September 10, 2020. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-09/documents/framework-conducting-pesticide-dw-sw.pdf
USEPA. (2020c). National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013–2014: A Collaborative Survey. EPA 841-R-19-001. Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/national-aquatic-resource-surveys/nrsa
USEPA. (2020d). Revised Method for National Level Listed Species Biological Evaluations of Conventional Pesticides (March 12, 2020), available at https://www.epa.gov/endangered-species/revised-method-national-level-listed-species-biological-evaluations-conventional
USEPA. (2020e). Revised Ecological Risk Mitigation and Response to Comments on the Ecological Risk Mitigation Proposal For 23 Chemicals. Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0331. https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0331
USEPA. (2021). Final National Level Listed Species Biological Evaluation for Carbaryl. Appendix 1-6. https://www.epa.gov/endangered-species/final-national-level-listed-species-biological-evaluation-carbaryl
USFWS, (2021). Draft Biological and Conference Opinion on the Registration of Malathion Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Program, Headquarters. February 2021 Draft. Docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0231. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0231-0001
Verdonck F., Jaworska, J., Janssen, C. & Vanrolleghem, P. (2002). Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment Framework for Chemical Substances. Proceedings of the iEMSs 2002 Conference. June 19, 2008. https://www.iemss.org/publications/conference/proceedings-of-the-iemss-2002-conference/
Verro, R., Calliera, M., Maffioli, G., Auteri, D., Sala, S., Finizio, A. & Vighi, M. (2002). GIS-Based System for Surface Water Risk Assessment of Agricultural Chemicals. 1. Methodological Approach. Environmental Science & Technology 36, no. 7 (April 2002): 1532–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010089o.
Williamson, C., Dodds, W., Kratz, T. & Palmer, M. (2008). Lakes and streams as sentinels of environmental change in terrestrial and atmospheric processes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol 6, Iss 5, p 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1890/070140
Winchell, M., Jackson, S., Wadley, A. & Srinivasan, R. (2008). Extension and validation of a geographic information system-based method for calculating the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation length-slope factor for erosion risk assessments in large watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(3):105-111. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.3.105
Winchell, M., Peranginangin, N., Estes, T., Padilla, L., Bang, J. & Budreski, K. (2014). Application of an Approach for Predicting Pesticide Concentrations in Static Water Bodies Using Spatially Explicit Hydrography, Landscape, and Pesticide Use Data, in: Jones, R., M. Shamim, and S. Jackson (Eds.), ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2014-1168.ch013
World Atlas. (2021). “Which Countries Export the Most Food?” https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-american-food-giant-the-largest-exporter-of-food-in-the-world.html
World Bank. (2021). https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Versions
- 2023-01-23 (6)
- 2023-01-23 (5)
- 2023-01-23 (4)
- 2023-01-20 (3)
- 2023-01-20 (2)
- 2022-10-26 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Christopher M Holmes, Dean Desmarteau, Amy Ritter, Paul Hendley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting content to the Journal of Regulatory Science (JRS), authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JRS the right of first publication. Authors retain patent, trademark, and other intellectual property rights (including research data) and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International — CC BY-NC 4.0 license agreement. The JRS is an open access journal and, as a result, articles are free to use with proper acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
- If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
- The publication of the submission has been approved by all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute or organization where the work has been carried out.
- Copyright has not been breached in seeking publication of the submission.
