Regulatory Science as a means to respond to EU healthcare challenges and global market needs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21423/JRS-V04N04P021Abstract
The current regulatory approval system for the placing of healthcare products at the disposition of patients is essentially a binary exercise (approval /disapproval) and is a costly, long and tortuous process. Regulations that primarily reflect patient concerns and that facilitate product entry to market are needed. The process requires a pooling of resources on an unprecedented scale from widely diering sectors, both within industry and outside of it. The needs exist to establish open transparent and intense dialogue between regulators and the regulated, to bring the fruits of innovation to patients at an aordable price and to expedite the innovation process.
https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs-v04n04p021 (DOI assigned 5/14/2019)
References
Advancing Regulatory Science at FDA, A Strategic Plan 2011. URL http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RegulatoryScience/UCM268225.pdf
A. A. Moghissi, S. R. Straja, et al, Innovation in Regulatory Science: Evolution of a New Scientific Discipline, Technology & Innovation 16 (2014) 155–165(11).
G. FitzGerald, Regulatory Science: What It Is and WhyWe Need It, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 89(2) (2011) 291–294.
T. Y. Wong, How to Bridge the ‘Valley of Death ’Between a Research Discovery and Clinical Application?, Annals Academy of Medicine 43 (2014) 422–424.
G. A. FitzGerald, Can Intellectual Property Save Drug Development?, Science 338 (2012) 483–484.
D. F., European Perspectives on Biomaterials for Health, EWMA Journal 15 (2015) 54–58.
Centers of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI). URL http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RegulatoryScience/ucm301667.htm
Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices, OJ L 189, 20.7.1990, p.1736.
Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices OJ L 169 , 12/07/1993 p.0001 0043.
Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices OJ L 331, 7.12.1998, p.1-37.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Medical Devices, and amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 /*COM/2012/0542 final - 2012/0266 (COD)*. URL http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52012PC0542
European Medicines Agency (2012). Performance of the Agency’s scientific procedures: 2011 report for medicinal products for human use. EMA/MB/157253/2012. URL http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2012/04/WC500124937.pdf
Commission Regulation (EC) No 668/2009 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the evaluation and certification of quality and non-clinical data relating to Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products developed by micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 194, 25.07.2009, p.7).
M. Goldman, The Innovative Medicines Initiative: A European Response to the Innovation Challenge,, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 91(3) (2012) 418–425.
Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products and amending Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (OJ L324, 10.12.2007, p.121).
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on advanced therapy medicinal products and amending Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, Brussels, 28.3.2014 COM(2014) 188 final.
Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on Medicinal Products for Paediatric Use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (Text with EEA relevance).
J. Abelson, P. G. Forest, J. Eyles, P. Smith, E. Martin, F. P. Gauvin, Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes, Social Science & Medicine 57 (2003) 239–251.
Priority Medicines for Europe and the World “A Public Health Approach to Innovation” Update on 2004 Background Paper - Background Paper 8.5 : “Patient and Citizen Involvement”, Ghislaine van Thiel, PhD and Pieter Stolk, PhD, 10 June 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting content to the Journal of Regulatory Science (JRS), authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JRS the right of first publication. Authors retain patent, trademark, and other intellectual property rights (including research data) and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International — CC BY-NC 4.0 license agreement. The JRS is an open access journal and, as a result, articles are free to use with proper acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
- If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
- The publication of the submission has been approved by all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute or organization where the work has been carried out.
- Copyright has not been breached in seeking publication of the submission.