Comparison of XRF, TXRF, and ICP-MS Methods for Determination of Mercury in Face Creams


  • Gordon Vrdoljak State of California Department of Public Health, Food and Drug Laboratory Branch, Richmond, CA
  • Peter Palmer Deptartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA
  • Richard Jacobs Currently retired, formerly with Division of Field Science, Food and Drug Administration, Alameda, CA
  • Bahman Moezzi State of California Department of Public Health, Food and Drug Laboratory Branch, Richmond, CA
  • Alanna Viegas State of California Department of Public Health, Food and Drug Laboratory Branch, Richmond, CA



mercury, face creams, XRF, TXRF, ICP-MS


Regulatory, media, and watchdog groups have identified numerous face cream products containing percent levels of mercury that far exceed the 1 ppm FDA regulatory limit. Mercury is added to these products to provide skin bleaching properties, and this poses a serious health risk to consumers. This study compares XRF, TXRF, and the more widely accepted ICP-MS methods for determination of mercury in face cream products. To identify contaminated products in a field setting, XRF is the preferred method, as it involves direct analysis of the sample, analysis times of a minute or less, and detection limits down to single ppm levels. XRF analysis gave quantitative results that compared well to those from ICP-MS for homogeneous products, but gave more variable results for products containing small crystals or chunks of inorganic mercury salts. More accurate results for these products requires preparation of a representative sample, microwave digestion, and TXRF or ICP-MS analysis. Given the continued production and distribution of mercury-containing face cream products, it is recommended that portable XRF be used to screen for such products or for accurate quantification of mercury in homogeneous products, and TXRF be used to determine the mercury content of more heterogeneous products.

Author Biography

  • Peter Palmer, Deptartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA

    Pete Palmer received a B.S. in Chemistry from Canisius Collegeand a Ph.D. in Analytical Chemistry from Michigan State University. After graduation, he worked in the Corporate Research Division of Proctor & Gamble designing and developing laboratory robotics systems, and at NASA Ames Research Center where he led efforts to apply Mass Spectrometry to life support, atmospheric, and ecosystems monitoring applications. Pete is currently a Professor in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at San Francisco State University (SFSU), Co-Director of SFSU’s Mass Spectrometry Facility, and Science Advisor for the FDA. His research interests focus on the development, characterization, and application of highly automated instrumentation for trace chemical analysis. Some of his applications to date include the development of Direct Sampling Mass Spectrometry and Solid Phase Microextraction GC/MS methods for life support and air quality monitoring, development of the first Proton Transfer Reaction Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer for monitoring volatile organic compounds in air, numerous case studies on the determination of pesticide contamination on Native American artifacts, and pioneering the use of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry for rapid screening of toxic elements in consumer products. Pete received the Jefferson Award in 2005 for community service in applying chemical analysis to serve the public interest.  


Al-Saleh, I., Khogali, F., Al-Amodi, M., El-Doush, I., Shinwari, N., & Al-Baradei, R. (2003). Histopathological Effects of Mercury in Skin-Lightening Cream. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, 22(4), 287-299.

Bennun, L., & Sanhueza, V. A. (2010). Procedure for the Improvement in the Determination of a TXRF Spectrometer Sensitivity Curve. Analytical Sciences, 26(3), 331-335.

Borgese, L., Zacco, A., Bontempi, E., Pellegatta, M., Vigna, L., Patrini, L., Riboldi, L., Rubino, F. M., & Depero, L.E. (2010). Use of Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence (TXRF) for the Evaluation of Heavy Metal Poisoning due to the Improper Use of a Traditional Ayurvedic Drug. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 52(5), 787-790.

Borgese, L., Dalipi, R., Riboldi, A., Bilo, F., Zacco, A., Federici, S., Bettinelli, M., Bontempi, E., & Depero, L. E. (2017). Comprehensive approach to the validation of the standard method for total reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis of water. Talanta, 181, 165-171.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012, January 20). Mercury Exposure Among Household Users and Nonusers of Skin-Lightening Creams Produced in Mexico -- California and Virginia, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(2), 33-36.

Chan, T. Y. K. (2011). Inorganic Mercury Poisoning Associated with Skin-Lightening Cosmetic Products. Clinical Toxicology, 49(10), 886-891.

FDA Bans Skin Whitening Products due to Mercury Content. (2011, August 6). The Manila Paper.

Gabler, E. & Roe, S. (2010, May 18). Some Skin Whitening Creams contain Toxic Mercury, Testing Finds. Chicago Tribune.

Gabler, E. & Roe, S. (2010, May 25). Mercury Content of Skin-Lightening Creams. Chicago Tribune.

Geer, L. A., Persad, M. D., Palmer, C. D., Steuerwald, A. J., Dalloul, M., Abulafia, O., & Parsons, P. J. (2012). Assessment of Prenatal Mercury Exposure in a Predominately Caribbean Immigrant Community in Brooklyn, NY. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14(3), 1035-1043.

International Organization for Standardization. (2015, July). Surface chemical analysis -- Use of Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence spectroscopy in biological and environmental analysis. ISO/TS 18507:2015. Retrieved November 2020 from

International Organization for Standardization. (2018, March). Surface chemical analysis -- Total reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis of water. Retrieved November 2020 from

McKelvey, W., Jeffery, N., Clark, N., Kass, D., & Parsons, P. J. (2011). Population-Based Inorganic Mercury Biomonitoring and the Identification of Skin Care Products as a Source of Exposure in New York City. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(2), 203-209.

Murphy, T., Lim, S., Huong, S. P., Irvine, K., Bayen, S., Kelly, B. C., & Wilson, K. (2012). Application of Handheld X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzers to Identify Mercury in Skin-Whitening Creams in Cambodia. Blacksmith Institute Journal of Health Pollution, 2(3), 1-32.

Olumide, Y. M., Akinkugbe, A. O., Altraide, D., Mohammed, T., Ahamefule, N., Ayanlowo, S., Onyekonwu, C., & Essen, N. (2008). Complications of chronic use of skin lightening cosmetics. International Journal of Dermatology, 47(4), 344-353.

Palmer, P. T., Jacobs, R., Baker, P. E., Ferguson, K., & Webber, S. (2009). Use of Field-Portable XRF Analyzers for Rapid Screening of Toxic Elements in FDA-Regulated Products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57(7), 2605-2613.

Palmer, P. T., Jacobs, R., Vrdoljak, G., Nausin, M., Qiu, C., & Yee, S. (2013, May). Use of Field Portable XRF for Screening and Quantitation of Mercury in Face Creams. FDA Laboratory Information Bulletin # 4542, 1-10.

Peregrino, C. P., Moreno, M. V., Miranda, S. V., Rubio, A. D., & Leal, L. O. (2011). Mercury Levels in Locally Manufactured Mexican Skin-Lightening Creams. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(6), 2516-2523.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). Requirements for Specific Cosmetic Products, 21 CFR § 700.13 Retrieved November 2020 from

Wencong, W. & Xin, Z. (2012, April 11). Whitening Creams Packed with Excessive Metals. China Daily.



2021-02-14 — Updated on 2021-02-14




Scientific Articles

How to Cite

Comparison of XRF, TXRF, and ICP-MS Methods for Determination of Mercury in Face Creams. (2021). Journal of Regulatory Science, 9(2), 1-8.